Saeima to the amendment of administrative areas and places a bill on all ZZS members voted, the office is the only coalition party, which expressed the view that it can not accept the planned wage stagnate in 2009, and pointed out that the government fulfill promises made to the above. 
As pointed out by the political Ivars Ijabs, the following steps in office shows that the Party felt strong enough, in addition to its ratings are high enough for the office should go the other coalition partners will spend the lot and wants to assert itself as an independent player.
Of course, the statistics office also is preparing the next municipal elections, Ijabs stressed, adding that the party is the political basis to feel frustrated, because the regional reforms will not result in the acquirer.
However, the political view, that these excesses should not give too great a role, because it is unlikely that the office has been willing to disrupt the coalition, even more so since unlikely to significantly alter the future composition of the coalition and the office itself would like to run the government. Therefore, most likely, at least with respect to the budget office with the coalition partners will reach a compromise, because this issue is no alternative. Even if the office would seek to achieve the government gāšanu, it is likely to lose some support Wants believes Ijabs.
In turn, Arnis Kaktiņš sociologist believes that the office's position on both these issues have a unifying cause, however, looked at each case individually. He said that the office of administrative reform position is based on the voters' interests.
Moreover, as pointed Kaktiņš, Party has long opposed the initiatives, and lots of other plans in this regard. Unfortunately he does not deny that the office will be able to expect that a lot of this action will follow the next European parliamentary and municipal elections.
As a populist Kaktiņš valued office position next year's budget issues. "ZZS should not be unrealistic about large on the economic situation in the country and its development," said Kaktiņš. "But lots of public rhetoric and action is inconsistent with the true situation, and, most likely, the lot is aware that the party is unlikely to initiatives budget issues is a good and desirable."
Also Kaktiņš does not believe that the office might upset the coalition, insisting that neither Party has both publicly about their opinions, and the last parliamentary term, the time constants gone to compromises. Office fully satisfied with the current situation.
